Post by KevinW on Feb 21, 2013 4:43:27 GMT -5
Before we start, let me say that Ms. Boyd in English first period suggested that Brutus was secretly (on the inside/subconsciously) evil. I don't believe a bucking (not misspelled) word of that, so I'll explain below.
Post your thoughts, too. Do you think Brutus is secretly evil? Why or why not? NOTE THAT THE POINT ISN'T ABOUT HOW STUPID OR EASILY PERSUADED BRUTUS IS. It's about if he is subconsciously evil, like Ms. Boyd suggested.
8. From 7, I suspect that Brutus was smart enough to realize how stupid it would be to walk up to a potential threat and ask him if he were a threat. I would not ask a suspected murderer if he was a murderer, or ask a suspected terrorist if he planned on bombing this plane. Seriously.
[/blockquote]
Post your thoughts, too. Do you think Brutus is secretly evil? Why or why not? NOTE THAT THE POINT ISN'T ABOUT HOW STUPID OR EASILY PERSUADED BRUTUS IS. It's about if he is subconsciously evil, like Ms. Boyd suggested.
I strongly disagree with the subconscious/Freudian (aka Loony) theory that Brutus is greatly influenced by his hidden "dark side." If the influence was great, we should see some manifestation. But so far I only see ignorance, stupidity, and blindness in Brutus's decision to join the conspiracy and kill his best buddy. The original theory was inferred from the following line of reasoning:[/i]. For example, in deciding whether or not to include Cinna (Act II Scene i?), Brutus commented that Cinna would rattle on them since he only follows his own plots.
1. Brutus is honorable.
2. Brutus suspects Caesar of abusing or threatening to abuse his power.
3. An honorable Brutus would have confronted Caesar about that.
4. Brutus did not confront Caesar, but was convinced by Cassius that Caesar is a threat and needs to be killed.
5. Therefore, Brutus is not honorable on the inside.
5a. Instead, Brutus came up with all those reasons to rationalize his selfish decision. In other words, Brutus was trying to convince himself that he isn’t evil.
I agree that humans are born selfish, but I do not think Brutus had anywhere enough “evil” to influence his decision to kill his friend. Here’s what I find wrong with that theory:
1. If Brutus was meant to be evil on the inside, then it would have manifested:
2. Evil Brutus was never explicitly shown from Acts I-III.
3. Evil Brutus was never implicitly shown from Acts I-III.
4. Most of the characters in this play are evil in some way. Brutus therefore is most effective if portrayed as the tragic hero.
5. Brutus never mentioned any subconscious desires in his monologues.
6. Cassius never attempted to covertly appeal to Brutus’s inner evil with bribes or gifts.
7. Brutus is careful enough to sometimes make careful choices
8. From 7, I suspect that Brutus was smart enough to realize how stupid it would be to walk up to a potential threat and ask him if he were a threat. I would not ask a suspected murderer if he was a murderer, or ask a suspected terrorist if he planned on bombing this plane. Seriously.
[/blockquote]